Which of the following is not evidence for evolution?
- A.
Divergent evolution of anatomical structures such as forelimbs
- B.
Convergent evolution of traits like wings of birds and butterflies
- C.
Paleontological evidence from fossil records
- D.
Embryological support for evolution as proposed by Ernst Heckel
-
First, recall which types of evidence are considered strong, reliable support for evolution by common descent.
-
Divergent evolution of anatomical structures such as forelimbs produces homologous organs, which share a common structural origin/ancestry — this directly supports the idea of common ancestry, so it is valid evidence for evolution.
-
Paleontological evidence from fossil records allows scientists to study organisms from different geological time periods, directly tracing evolutionary change over time — this is valid evidence for evolution.
-
Convergent evolution of traits like wings of birds and butterflies, however, produces analogous organs — structures that appear similar simply because unrelated species independently adapted to similar needs, without sharing a common ancestor. Since this doesn't demonstrate shared ancestry, it does not serve as evidence for evolution in the same way.
-
Embryological support for evolution as proposed by Ernst Haeckel (the idea that "ontogeny repeats phylogeny," based on observed similarities in early vertebrate embryos) was later disapproved after careful study by Karl Ernst von Baer, who showed that embryonic similarities don't hold up as strongly as originally claimed — so this is not valid/accepted evidence for evolution.
-
Hence, the answer is B, D.